This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| 
                    linear_stm [2009/11/30 11:22] vroz  | 
                
                    linear_stm [2011/02/18 13:13] (current) | 
            ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| ==== The Linear STM ==== | ==== The Linear STM ==== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
| === options.inp === | === options.inp === | ||
| + | Here the settings is same ([The files]), just the **ICUTT** parameter we have to change to value 1. Than the scan will be linear. Other values can stay same. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | === scan.inp === | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the case of linear scan, the initial and final point should be changed maybe. But the **XMIN XMAX** or the **YMIN YMAX** will be same there.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Than, you can run the **STM** code for linear scan simulation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Output === | ||
| + | |||
| + | As an output, we will obtain the "scan_cut_deno.out" or "scan_cut_nden.out" file, depends on the settings (the denominator means the multiple scattering is involved and the *nden.out file is obtained). The file has the following format (there is 50 rows, the scan is from the point (0.0,0.0) to (0.0,4.1742) for the distance 3A): | ||
| + | |||
| + | 0.000000  0.000000  0.000000  3.000000  0.14821E-05 \\ | ||
| + | 0.083484  0.000000  0.083484  3.000000  0.14866E-05 \\ | ||
| + | . \\ | ||
| + | . \\ | ||
| + | . \\ | ||
| + | 4.174200  0.000000  4.174200  3.000000  0.14821E-05 | ||
| + | The first column gives us the length of path of the tip over the surface from the initial point, columns 2 and 3 are the x and y coordinate of the tip, 4. is the distance between tip apex and the surface and 5. column gives us the current at the given xy position. | ||